C‑DRONE
Agricultural drone flying over a farm field

C-DRONE GUIDE · 5 AUGUST 2026

Counting missing vines in a vineyard by drone: method, replanting, prices

Every dead or uprooted vine is a recurring loss: in a vineyard planted at 8,000 vines per hectare, a 5% missing rate means 400 unproductive positions — several hectolitres lost, vintage after vintage. Between esca and the other trunk diseases, machinery accidents and climate stress, the missing rate drifts silently: few estates know it precisely, because counting on foot is long and tedious. The drone changes the scale: in one flight, every row is photographed, every vine position checked, and the gap map becomes a management tool — to plan replanting, back up a purchase negotiation or track dieback over time.

Published on 5 August 2026, reviewed on 5 August 2026 — regulations in force as of August 2026.

Why the missing rate is a strategic number

The missing rate feeds three major decisions. Replanting first: replacing dead vines means ordering plants (custom-grafted, often a year ahead), sizing the work and targeting the areas — decisions that demand a reliable inventory, per block and per row. Vineyard value second: in a sale or tenancy, actual yield potential depends directly on effective density; an objective audit of missing vines carries weight in the negotiation, exactly as a roof survey does for a building. Dieback monitoring last: comparing maps year over year reveals the dynamics — spreading esca clusters, rows weakened by drought — and lets you act before a block falls below the profitability threshold that justifies full grubbing-up.

Vineyard dieback claims several percent of French production potential every year: knowing your own rate, block by block, is the first step of any recovery plan.

The method: photograph every row, detect every gap

The typical mission flies in very high resolution RGB: the drone covers the block on a programmed route, images are assembled by photogrammetry, then dedicated processing reconstructs each row axis and checks for vegetation at every theoretical vine position, derived from the planting spacing. Two flight windows are used: in full canopy, where a gap in the foliage flags the missing vine (with the risk that a vigorous neighbour masks it), and in the dormant season, where bare trunks are detected individually. The choice depends on training system and vigour; on very vigorous blocks the two flights complement each other.

The reliability of these approaches is research-backed: Salvatore Filippo Di Gennaro and Alessandro Matese (Italian CNR) published in 2020 in Plant Methods an unsupervised procedure for canopy biomass estimation and missing plant detection from drone RGB images, tested on a real vineyard with 2.5D and 3D approaches (see the study on Google Scholar). The same flight delivers more than the gaps, too: a per-vine vigour map, useful for selective harvesting and diagnosing weak zones.

Deliverables: from the map to the plant order form

The typical delivery includes:

The same campaign combines readily with other drone-based vineyard diagnostics: water stress in summer, spring frost risk mapping at the end of winter, and — on steep slopes — steep-slope spraying. One contractor, several deliverables, shared preparation.

2026 prices

Orders of magnitude observed in France in 2026 (excl. VAT):

The cost compares with manual counting — several hours per hectare, error-prone — and above all with the shortfall of poorly targeted replanting. Request a quote stating area, planting spacing and objective (replanting, audit, monitoring): the optimal flight window follows from it.

Request a free quote

Put it into practice

Also worth reading